First and Second Post on The 2001 Evidence - Pictures - LARGE LETTERS

                                                                                   First Post of Two:  

  I just want you to concentrate on the 2001 evidence that the prosecutors said they had that convinced them that without a doubt Jerry Sandusky raped a child in a shower room in the Lasch building at Penn State University in 2001. 
   The evidence they said they had. That convinced them to press charges and accuse Penn State officials of a cover up. 
    Got it?

   WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?  WHAT HAPPENED TO THE EVIDENCE THEY SAID THEY HAD THAT PROVED THE GUILT OF SANDUSKY AND PROVED THE COVER UP BY THE OFFICIALS?

   WHERE IS THAT EVIDENCE?

  I want you to understand that the prosecutors never presented any evidence. They just kept saying over and over that they had this evidence that would prove them guilty. But no one has ever heard of or seen the evidence.

That's what I'm saying. When are they going to present evidence from 2001?

                                                                                                                                                                                                    

                                                                            Second Post

          Now, just before the prosecutors pressed charges against Sandusky and accused the officials of covering up for him, they came out with claims that they had evidence that would surely prove that they were all guilty. That the actual date of the incident that was reported by Mike McQueary was 2001 and not 2002 as McQueary first stated to the state prosecutors.  (Linda Kelly.)

         Later; McQueary was convinced by the prosecution that he was mistaken about the date of the incident. And he agreed with them that the date was actually 2001, like they believed.

        What was it? What was it that made the investigators and prosecutors  so sure they were guilty? Why wasn't the evidence ever checked? What was it that they had on them? What could it be?

     I say it was a video tape. A secret video tape. 

   If there was a video tape that they believed was a recording of Sandusky raping a child in a shower room, where did it come from? 
   Was there any other information that related to the 2001 incident?
  
   Next post: I will explain the 2001 incident. And I will cover the video tape. Where I think it was made and when. Also, I will talk about the relationship between the tape and the 2001 incident.
  Later-