What satisfaction do I get out of this? They say I go on and on and on. Every day I have something to Tweet about or I say something on G+ that most people ignore. Sometimes I get as little as ten views for the whole day on my blog, but that's all I have. I'm not a big time reporter, I just knew Sandusky was innocent and the school officials did nothing wrong, that they were accused of. *How could they? If there was only one known incident and I was there at the school, in the locker room, when it happened? Sandusky wasn't. A child wasn't. It was 9:30 in the morning, not at night. It was in the Student Athletic Services building, not in the Lasch building.
What I get out of this work is the satisfaction that when our system doesn't work right, there are still people who believe in fair justice. And in this case it was a simple matter to prove the Penn State officials innocent and that Sandusky was not involved in the only incident in 2001.
Knowing that the information they must have had was false, or falsified. No one knew I was there. No one remembered the actual incident in 2001, but I did.
Calhoun saw the imposter in the shower room in 1998 with me and the security guard. He said nothing. Or, he was told not to say anything. But was he told to bring attention to Sandusky by saying he saw him in the Smeal building? I think so!
I did have some personal involvement in the case, even though I was unknown.
If Sandusky is acquitted, because someone finally decides to actually check the false evidence, then I'll be satisfied.
If the prosecutors drop the goofy, idiotic, charges against the officials, then I'll be satisfied.
If Paterno is given back his wins and the school and prosecutors apologize to his family for the gross injustice, then I'll be satisfied.
When will they seek the facts about the 2001 evidence, which was used to bring charges against the school? Where is the information that made them believe officials were guilty of a cover up? Where is the evidence they claimed to have had on Sandusky raping a child in a shower room in 2001? (There isn't any evidence. There isn't any information.)
Is it possible, that in 2002, McQueary did see a man in the shower room in the Lasch building that was a Sandusky look alike? Yes.
Was it possible that Calhoun saw a man in the shower room in the Morgan building that was a Sandusky imposter, posing as Sandusky, making a video tape? Yes.
I know it's possible, because I saw him myself at the same time the security guard and Calhoun did.
Did the security guard write a report on it? Was the report taken out of an office in the Morgan building? If so, was the security guard not working at Penn State anymore when the report was taken; when the office was broken into, after hours?
Is the report missing? Is the security guard missing? Did Ray Gricar suspect foul play? Is that why he came up missing?
Why was the matter of the man who looked like Jerry Sandusky making a video tape, in the shower room, pretending to molest a child never mentioned?
A video tape of a man that looked like, but wasn't Jerry Sandusky, pretending to molest a child. The little man in the tape looked like a child of about twelve, but was still just a man, not a child. Not a child. A man. A little man who I thought was a child when I first walked into the shower room.
In the shower room, with the man who looked like Sandusky and the little man, was another man holding the video camera. And a man named George Steinbrenner.
Was the incident covered up? Is that the real reason Calhoun thought he might lose his job, if he said something about Steinbrenner?
If there was a complaint about a person someone thought was Sandusky but was actually the impostor, did Gricar clear Sandusky but not know about the look alike?
Did the look alike do things that people believed was Sandusky?
It seems so.
The kid in the high school locker room. For one.
Make your own personalized
hats online at Zazzle.
No comments:
Post a Comment
comment now!!!